Primary supervisor
Jesmin NaharLung cancer prediction research in computer science focuses on overcoming critical data engineering and algorithmic challenges—such as severe class imbalance in Electronic Health Records (EHR), high-dimensional tabular feature interactions, and the opacity of deep neural networks.
To address these AI-specific bottlenecks, this research proposes an end-to-end Predictive Artificial Intelligence pipeline designed for early risk scoring and multi-class stage prediction.
1. Research Objectives & Predictive AI Architecture
-
The Computational Bottleneck: Real-world clinical datasets present extreme minority-class sparsity (far fewer positive cancer instances than non-cancerous records), causing standard ML models to suffer from high false-negative bias.
-
The AI Solution: Design an automated predictive architecture that ingests tabular EMR variables (demographics, behavioral risk factors, routine blood indices) and computes continuous probability scores for early cancer risk.
-
Core Contribution: Evaluate data-centric AI techniques to improve predictive recall, precision, and multi-class stage classification accuracy without relying exclusively on compute-heavy imaging pathways.
2. Machine Learning Pipeline & Algorithmic Design
-
Synthetic Data Augmentation: Solves class imbalance by training Generative Adversarial Networks (e.g., CTGAN) and oversampling frameworks (e.g., K-Means SMOTE) to generate realistic minority-class embeddings.
-
Predictive Modeling: Benchmark ensemble gradient boosting classifiers (XGBoost, LightGBM, Random Forest) and Multi-Layer Perceptrons (MLP) to learn complex, non-linear feature interactions across tabular patient attributes.
-
Performance Metrics: Evaluates system predictive power using AUC-ROC (>0.95), Precision-Recall curves (AUC-PR), and Sensitivity to ensure high detection accuracy on unseen test cohorts.
3. Predictive Risk Modeling & Explainable AI (XAI)
-
Probabilistic Risk Scoring: Translates raw model outputs into calibrated probability scores, stratifying patients into low-, intermediate-, or high-risk tiers for clinical triage.
-
Explainable AI Integration: Implements SHAP (Shapley Additive exPlanations) and LIME to audit model predictions, exposing exact feature attributions (e.g., smoking pack-years, specific symptom combinations) that drive high risk predictions to validate algorithmic fairness and transparency.
Aim/outline
Aim
To construct an interpretable, high-precision predictive AI framework for early lung cancer risk scoring and stage prediction by optimizing ensemble classification architectures, generative data synthesis, and Explainable AI (XAI) feature attribution.
Outline
-
Predictive Problem Formulation: Framing early detection and stage prediction as multi-class machine learning inference tasks while identifying primary computational bottlenecks (class imbalance, high feature dimensionality, and false-negative misclassifications).
-
Generative Data Engineering & Imbalance Resolution: Applying advanced oversampling techniques (e.g., CTGAN, K-Means SMOTE) to synthesize minority-class samples, ensuring the predictive model learns unbiased decision boundaries.
-
Predictive Model Development & Optimization: Benchmarking gradient-boosted decision trees (XGBoost, LightGBM, CatBoost) and Multi-Layer Perceptrons (MLPs), utilizing hyperparameter optimization to maximize predictive sensitivity and stage classification accuracy.
-
Explainable AI (XAI) & Feature Attribution: Fusing SHAP (Shapley Additive exPlanations) and LIME to interpret predictive outputs, isolating key behavioral, demographic, and clinical features driving high-risk predictions.
-
Statistical Risk Scoring & Model Validation: Translating model prediction probabilities into calibrated risk scores and validating system performance using diagnostic metrics (AUC-ROC, AUC-PR, Matthews Correlation Coefficient, Sensitivity).
Required knowledge
For IT students conducting AI research on lung cancer prediction, required knowledge encompasses four key computer science competencies:
-
Tabular & Synthetic Preprocessing: Addressing severe medical class imbalance and incomplete EMR data using generative models (e.g., CTGAN), oversampling algorithms (e.g., K-Means SMOTE), and multivariate statistical imputation.
-
Ensemble & Neural Architectures: Designing and tuning tree-based ensemble models (XGBoost, LightGBM, Random Forest) and multi-layer perceptrons to learn complex non-linear patterns across tabular demographic and clinical features.
-
Explainable AI (XAI): Applying local and global interpretability frameworks like SHAP and LIME to eliminate "black-box" decision-making and extract explicit feature attributions for clinical trust.
-
Diagnostic Metrics & Evaluation: Assessing model reliability using domain-specific AI evaluation metrics—such as AUC-ROC, Precision-Recall curves (AUC-PR), Matthews Correlation Coefficient (MCC), and Sensitivity—to minimize false-negative misclassifications.